Go Goa Gone

Poolside 1 BHK Apartment in Resort

Siolim, Goa, India
Serene Siolim- Gateway to the pristine beaches of North Goa at Tropical Dreams Resort with Lush green surroundings Ground Floor across the biggest swimming pool in Goa is furnished with SplitAC Ref...
Vacation Rentals in Siolim

Friday, February 18, 2011

10 Janpath’s Discreet Chanakya | Hard News



10 Janpath’s Discreet Chanakya


Politicians across the spectrum consider Ahmed Patel second only to Sonia Gandhi. So what makes him tick?
Akash Bisht Delhi

At a recent informal gathering, a leader of a key UPA ally was seen openly criticising the Congress leadership on the issue of rising food prices and inflation. Busy in his verbal tirade, he paid no attention to his secretary who had one hand on the phone and the other on the mouthpiece. After several attempts, the veteran took notice of his secretary with the phone. He said, "Tell him to call later." The secretary came close and whispered - for everyone to hear: "It's Ahmed Patel."

The politician jumped up as if bitten by a scorpion, grabbed the phone, and hurriedly walked out of the room to the sprawling lawn of his party office in New Delhi. He was obviously trying to clarify his stance on the controversial comments he had just aired on TV news channels. Later, he rationalised, "Ahmed Bhai said the comments were hitting below the belt."

Popularly known as Ahmed Bhai, politicians across the spectrum consider Ahmed Patel second only to Congress President Sonia Gandhi. He is the crisis man and widely perceived in political circles to be consulted by the Congress chief herself for every political overture. He is known to be an efficient and reasonable crisis manager and fire-fighter, but remains stoically silent when it comes to sharing his views with party colleagues and others. No one, practically, knows his mind. Insiders say he only shares his mind with Sonia Gandhi.

The recent cabinet reshuffle, too, had his indelible imprint whereby some with proximity to him bagged handsome portfolios. "He has been a Congress loyalist since the days of Indira Gandhi. He was the trusted man of Rajiv Gandhi and even other Congress presidents in the past. What sets him apart from the rest is his discreet nature and his ability to avoid any personal-political ambitions," says Vijay Sanghvi, veteran Gujarati journalist who knows Ahmed Patel since his early days in politics.

Born to Mohammed Ishakji Patel and Hawaben Mohammedbhai in 1949, Patel hails from the small village of Piraman in Bharuch district, Gujarat. He did his BSc at Shree Jayendra Puri Arts and Science College, Bharuch. His father was a member of the taluk panchayat at Bharuch. He was a well-known Congressman in the area. In his late 20s, Patel took the plunge in active politics and became a member of the Pradesh Youth Congress in 1977. "His father, being a known face in Gujarat Congress, helped Patel launch his political career. Belonging to a minority community worked to his advantage," says a Congress worker from Gujarat. In 1977, he fought his first Lok Sabha elections and won from Bharuch. He later went on to become the youngest president of the Gujarat Pradesh Youth Congress Committee.

To his credit, he is only the second Muslim to have won a Lok Sabha election from Gujarat along with Ehsan Jafri, the scholarly politician who was murdered along with several others by a VHP-BJP mob in the Gulbarg Society massacre during the Gujarat genocide, 2002. He later went on to win two more Lok Sabha elections from the same constituency, and lost two.

Patel was considered to wield clout with Indira Gandhi. He convinced her to hold meetings in his constituency in 1977 after she had lost the elections and was literally in the abyss, post Emergency, her popularity at an all-time low, her charisma shattered. "Indira Gandhi wanted to induct fresh faces in Congress and Patel being an early bloomer and a minority leader helped her in entrusting faith on him," says a Gujarat leader.

"Patel and Sanat Mehta invited Indira Gandhi for four meetings in their respective constituencies. She told them that this would be a disaster as she has been routed in the elections after Emergency, but the duo managed to convince her. This eventually kind of re-launched the return of Indira Gandhi who later entrusted faith in Patel after she came back to power in 1980," recalls Sanghvi. It is said that she even offered him a ministerial berth which he reportedly declined. These overtures helped Patel establish himself as a close confidante of the Gandhi parivar.

Soon after Indira Gandhi's assassination, Rajiv Gandhi became the Congress president and Ahmed Patel was made general secretary of the All India Congress Committee (AICC) in 1984. Rajiv was considered close to Patel owing to the latter's allegiance to Indira Gandhi and being a leader from Bharuch - that was also the birthplace of his father, Feroze Gandhi. "Rajiv has been emotionally attached to Bharuch and this brought the two together," says another Gujarat leader.

Since then, there has been no looking back for Patel who has held one or the other meaty profile in the AICC. After he declined to be a minister in Rajiv Gandhi's cabinet, he was made parliamentary secretary to the prime minister with Arun Singh and Oscar Fernandes.

After Narasimha Rao succeeded Rajiv Gandhi in 1991, Patel became a member of the Congress Working Committee, the post he holds till date. During Sitaram Kesari's tenure, Patel was elevated to the coveted post of the party treasurer from which he resigned after news of differences between him and Sonia Gandhi's personal secretary, V George, surfaced. "This was perhaps the only political mistake that he ever committed in his political career at the Centre. He was intelligent and tactful enough to soon sort out the differences with Sonia Gandhi and managed to win her trust yet again. At present, many perceive him as Sonia's right hand man," says a party leader.

Such is his hold over the party that politicians shy away from uttering anything that favours or criticises him. No one would really want to offend him, or be in his bad books. Also, apparently, many appointments for party posts or nominations for elections are done with his approval. Obviously, he draws direct or tacit power from the Congress president, since he is her political advisor. Many refer to him as a modern day Chanakya who works behind the scene and makes certain ministers wait for days for an appointment.

So, what makes Ahmed Bhai such an important man despite his being an extremely media shy, soft-spoken, humble and simple individual?

An old friend of Patel recalls that he would ferry him to Parliament on a Rajdoot bike to book railway tickets under the MP quota in 1977. "He was always a helpful and flexible guy those days. He used to accompany people to every possible ministry for their work, as he never said no to anyone for anything," recalls an old friend from Gujarat. To his criticism, many believe that this 'soft attitude' has hurt party prospects in various states, especially in 'hardline BJP's Gujarat'. "Different people give him all sorts of advice and he often agrees to many of them. This has led to the steady downfall of Congress in the state," says a senior Gujarat leader.

His critics call him a leader with no mass base, an average political strategist, someone who is not popular with the Gujarat Congress leaders or workers who blame him for the party's repeated and dismal performance in the state. Indeed, before Narendra Modi's polarising arrival, activists say - his hyper-communal propaganda and hate politics after the genocide in 2002 - the faction-ridden BJP was in dire straits, losing almost every local election in Gujarat. Even in the successive assembly elections, the Congress lost by low margins in many constituencies, the party still had a strong vote base, and it actually gained in the Lok Sabha elections. Despite Ahmed Patel, say insiders.

"His quest to please everyone is seriously hurting party interests. He would give tickets to individuals based on personal equations rather than the ground situation. This has decimated the Congress in Gujarat. If some measures are not taken immediately, we will stare at a Bihar-like situation for years to come," says a Gujarat Congress leader.

Some criticise him for playing a shrewd, invisible, tacit game of soft, deceptive alliance with Narendra Modi. There have been instances, like the Narmada Bachao Andolan's struggle against the big dam in Gujarat some years ago, when Medha Patkar was on an indefinite fast in Delhi, when it was supposed to be Ahmed Bhai's hand which pushed Congress leaders into the happy lap of big brother Modi. Besides, despite Sonia Gandhi's strong secular credentials, and Rahul Gandhi's stated position against communal politics, especially in the context of the Gujarat carnage, Patel's positions on Gujarat have been subdued, mysterious, unstated, often in the realm of a strange kind of silence.

How secular is indeed Patel's secularism?

However, his detractors, too, praise him for his handling of crisis situations and backroom negotiations with political leaders from various quarters and across the spectrum. "He has been loyal to the family for decades and being close to Rajiv certainly helped him in gaining Sonia's trust. His simplicity, loyalty, discreetness and commitment towards the party and its leadership are some of the reasons for his meteoric rise," says Sanghvi.

Also, it is widely known that Gujarat provides a lot of funds to the Congress's kitty, and Patel is known to have chummy and cordial relations with industrialists. This 'corporate angle' has added to his profile. "He gets the oil that runs the Congress machinery," jokes a senior leader.

A devout Muslim, Patel never misses his Friday namaz and prefers different mosques each time to avoid public glare. He consciously shuns publicity. It is even difficult to get his pictures along with Sonia Gandhi or the prime minister, whom he meets frequently. He visits his village quite often and is known to be happier in the company of family members rather than politicians. His wife and children, or family members, are hardly seen at public events and they even avoid political gatherings. "His total loyalty and commitment to the Gandhi parivar makes him what he is today and will continue to do so in the future," says a Gujarati politician and friend.

"He is a very simple man who has been driving an old Maruti Esteem for more than 15 years. He shies away from controversies since he prefers to live and work discreetly. He is totally tuned into the power and coalition politics of Delhi and knows what it takes to be in power without actually being in power," says a party leader.

Indeed, despite his strategic discretion, it always helps in the obsessive power circles in Delhi to build up a status symbol via proximity to Ahmed Bhai, or being close to his political network. "Many things can't move without his consent, tacit or otherwise," says a political observer. "It always helps to be close to him and have his ear if possible. No wonder, he is the powerful one mentioned by certain big-time journalists in the Radia tapes."

From the print issue of Hardnews : FEBRUARY 2011

India may have an Egypt-like revolution soon: Baba Ramdev

India may have an Egypt-like revolution soon: Baba Ramdev

'India may have an Egypt-like revolution soon'

Updated on Thursday, February 17, 2011, 15:51
Tags: Black Money, Baba Ramdev, Kahiye Janab


Indians have witnessed, with a painful heart, a year of scams and scandals. Now, they are witnessing something unparallel in the history unfolding across the seas. With the Arab world shaken to their core following the uprising and revolutions against corrupt regimes and autocrats, Indians too are wondering will something similar happen in the subcontinent.

At such a crucial juncture, Zee News’ Swati Chaturvedi talks to the firebrand yoga teacher-cum-politician Baba Ramdev, who has launched a crusade against the corrupt.

Excerpts:

Swati: Welcome to Kahiye Janab. In Egypt, people have come out on the streets against corruption. In India, the government promptly sends us notices if we fail to pay our taxes, but why is the same government reluctant to even name the tax evaders who have crores of black money (stashed abroad)?

Baba Ramdev: Three years back, Hasan Ali got a notice and was asked to pay up Rs 50,000 crores for evading taxes. But now, he is living a luxurious life. However, he is not the only person (who has black money). The government is lying about thousands of such persons. About Rs 300 lakh crore worth of black money is stashed abroad. The government has lied before the Supreme Court and the country’s citizens. Some say about half of India’s GDP is transferred out of the country every year in the form of black money. This is a big issue. The Centre is in a denial mode. The government confesses that it is a big issue but is doing nothing in this regard.

Swati: Corruption in India is at its peak, but the PM only says that the situation is sad. What do you have to say on this?

Baba Ramdev: Today, India is ranked as the 4th largest economy in the world. It could become the No. 1 economy if we can root out corruption from our country.

The Centre is not honest about tackling corruption. The party, which is ruling at the Centre, has been in power intermittently for about 40 years, and it is in their rule that such a huge amount of black money was sent out of the country.



Swati: When the common man can be thrown into jail (for failing to pay taxes), why cannot the government name these big tax evaders?



Baba Ramdev: Well, the Centre has all the names who have evaded taxes. This is entirely national wealth. Now look, around one lakh people in this country are involved in illegal mining. This is not at all their hard earned money. So, it is not only an issue of tax evasion, but people are also engaged in looting national resources. The government should not merely recover the black money from them, but they must also be thrown into jail.

Swati: Today, we are faced with gigantic issues like (corruption involving) CVC and (scam in allocation of) 2G (spectrum) but (our Telecom Minister) Kapil Sibal says these are not big things. Do you believe there is any hope left for this country?

Baba Ramdev: The Centre got A Raja arrested. In fact, they have protected Raja by placing someone else in the Telecom Ministry and tampering with the documents. Raja is now getting a five-star treatment in jail. Also, how can Sibal question a statutory body like the CAG?

Five years back, people were not willing to agree that corruption is a central issue in our country’s politics. But the people are aware now. We will not tolerate corruption anymore. We will conduct a signature campaign and hold a march this February 27. We will try to start an Egypt like movement in the country sans violence. There will be a revolution in the country. People will come out on the streets. We will not tolerate these corrupt people anymore.

Swati: Egypt just witnessed a revolution. Will there be a similar movement in India too?



Baba Ramdev: Mubarak was exposed. Delhi too will wake up on February 27 when more than one lakh people will gather (to protest against corruption). The governments are deaf, dumb and blind. Can’t they see the hardship of the common man who is living in dire poverty? We will show them on March 23 something they can never imagine.

Swati: People say you are a supporter of the BJP. They question, why has a yoga guru entered politics? What do you have to say about this?

Baba Ramdev: When I started this movement, people said the corruption is not an issue. Now, it is an issue! I now conduct meetings involving around 2 lakh people every day.

Yes, I was pained when people doubted me, especially when I was trying to do something for the country. However, all that is now a dead issue. Has any politician ever got the love and affection, that I am getting, from the 120 crore people of this country?

I will teach yoga till my last breath, but I will also work to bring prosperity to this country. By 2020, India will be the top economy of the world.

Swati: You are again and again talking about corrupt people. Can you name any of these persons?

Baba Ramdev: About 90-99% of all those who are at the top of the political spectrum are corrupt. But yes, I don’t want to name any individual. These people, who are at the top of the government hierarchy, have looted the country.

In fact, I would recommend Narco tests for all citizens. Then the truth will come out automatically. I can name a few persons – two or three chief ministers and politicians – who are corrupt.

Swati: According to a research, in our current Parliament, all the leaders of the Congress party who are under the age of 30 belong to one or the other political family. What do you have to say on this prince culture?

Baba Ramdev: We won’t allow nepotism in this country anymore. They have to answer the people. Those who are saying that they will be the next prime minister, please visit villages once a year. I spend each day in a village. The poor and downtrodden people of this country will stand up one day. They won’t allow such nepotism.

Swati: Now let’s talk about one more important issue. Last year, one of the country’s highest civilian awards - the Padma Bhusan - was given to Sant Singh Chatwal. This year also, the government conferred the Padma award to Montek Singh Alhuwalia. His wife was also conferred with the Padma award sometime back. Do you think our country has become a plutocracy?

Baba Ramdev: When it comes to awards and recognition, there are only a few people who really deserve it. But most of those who praise the government usually get it. We have downgraded the importance of these awards.

The government can reward singers, but why does it fail to recognise those who have died for the country? Does Subhash Chandra Bose not deserve this award? Does Sardar Patel not deserve it? It is shameful.

Swati: Today, politicians are making a brand of themselves. Somebody becomes a representative of Dalits, while others choose some other caste. Do you feel sad about it?

Baba Ramdev: Today, Brahmins feel that I am close to them as I am well versed with shastras, while Kshatriyas feel I am like them because of my aggressive nature. Vaisyas too think I can bring prosperity to the country. Hence, the whole country is with me. On the other hand, (people who are resorting to the use of) such brand politics will (ultimately) divide the country. Whoever forms the government on such brand politics (should be asked) what have they done (for the country)?

Swati: Finally, I would like to ask about your message for the country.

Baba Ramdev: Sarfaroshi ki tamanna ab hamaare dil mein hai; Dekhna hai zor kitna baazu-e-qaatil mein hai….

Swati: Thank you for coming on the show.

Anil Kumar Satapathy



RAMDEV IS A KIND OF GOD GIFT TO INDIA,ACTUALLY HE IS THE ONLY HOPE LEFT. PEOPLE LIKE KAPIL SIBAL IS A BLOT TO THE NATION.CONGRESS PARTY IS IN THE BUSINESS OF LOOTING INDIA AND SENDING THE WHOLE MONEY TO SWISS BANK & ITALY.THE REAL CULPRIT IS SONIA GANDHI.SHE IS THE SUPER PRIME MINISTER AND DOING EVERYTHING WRONG FROM THE BACK DOOR.RAHUL BABA IS ALSO A KIND OF JOKER.
HE IS PREACHING EVERYWHERE TO YOUNG AND HIMSELF IS A CORRUPT GUY,

ONLY RAMDEV HAS A POWER TO CORRECT EVERYTHING,THIS IS MY REQUEST TO ALL INDIANS,PLEASE SUPPORT HIM.

sanjeev - gurgaon

We are totally with Baba Ramdev. In this hour of darkness, our country desperately needed a peson like him to have the courage to speak the truth and fight for the truth. May God be kind enough to mobilise all patriotic Indians to stand behind him and fight the menace together.

Sir, we are all with you..Jai Hind

Rajib - Bokaro Steel City

Baba Ramdev ji,

We salute your every effort of health making to nation building.Baba your revolution against corrupt regime is highly admireable.Sir
but to bring change you also need a team of honest,inteligent,dedicted and secular person(not psuedo secular}.At Present we indian have two honest & dynamic leader whom we can trust.
They are Nitish Kumar & Narendra Modi.
We must givr our support to them and try to bring them at the top most post in India for clean and efficient governance.

sunil bardia - kolkata

I wish the day will come when Indians too will bring The System down. But I wish even more that it will not be led by you baba cuz you are just one of them!

Harvinder - Manila, Philippines

Baba, the country needs change and we support you in your movement.

Anshuman - Pune

Happiness Guruji. I remember vivekananda tell give me 100 youing indians, we will create a different India. Today 100 000 young Indians are asking for a leader and here we are blessed by god for ging us you.

krish harikrishnan - coimbatore

In Egypt people are of same religion but here in India there are so many different religion and caste and community that to unite them against these politician is herculean task and people like Gandhiji does not come not and then. We are so divided in thoughts and other petty things that it will require dozen men like Gandhiji to kick out these corrupt people. Even Gandhiji had to say at the end of his life that he was in favour of dissolving the congress party. IF it happens well and good. Mr Ramdeve have to also think about people working for him. How sincere and efficient they are. I have sent an email inquiring about treatment - I have not received reply from last 6 months. This is how organisation works

janak chauhan - vadodara

revolution should be to throw out Nehru family rule in India.like Mubarak Sonia and his supporters from India,start as a second freedom struggle to free India from the clutches of foreign rule and looting Indian money.we all with you.

Bhagavath - chennai

we are waiting for the golden day thanks baba as soon as possible do the same we are with you
thanking you

vinay - chandigarh

Good Ramdev ,I am glad at last there is someone who is at least trying to stop corruption.But remember the people who have stashed this money overseas are also very powerful people.Ramdev will have to have concrete stretgy to firstly stem the flow of money out of India.A Egypt like revolution?It may be possible if the people stay united.But in India there are lot of traitors too,you must remember.It appears to me everything is forgotten when the General Election is on people keep on repeating the same mistake of bringing the corrupt people to power.




I am completely agree with Guru Ramdev baba statement. Congress has ruled more than 40 yrs and it has been noticed that this government is most corrupted government and its people. CAG is so reputed deptt and Mr. Kamil Sibal is saying `zero loss` money to nation. Now CBI has caught only 2 companies and accounted 22000 crores loss. Now where is Mr. `zero loss` theory founder.

We need change and and want back all nation money from all corrupted persons and politician. If nation require, we can hang all corrupted persons and politician. We need to make revolution against government specially Congress.

Shailendra - Hyderabad

All good and patriotic Indians should join Baba Ramdev s movement.A yogi has come to save us from this hell.We must do our bit otherwise future generations will curse us.Jai Hind.

dildar katoch - guwahati

I REALLY WISH,BUT INDIANS 1000 + YEARS OF SLAVERY IN BLOOD CURRENTLY SLAVES OF KHADI AND KHAKI DON,T HAVE GUTS TO SOME THING LIKE THAT,AND OTHER CHOICE THEY HAVE THERE IS NO LIGHT IN THIS DARK TUNNEL,EVERY PARTY IS AS CORRUPT AS RULING ONE.

BRIJ - NEWYORK

@hasan abbas I have donated 2500 rupees to Bharat Swabhiman and donates 200 rupees ever month instead of wasting money in other stuffs.

Bharat Swabhiman has 1 crore members like me.
Some donate 11 rs some like me donate 2500 rs and some rich and succesful patriots donates in lakhs.

Bharat Swabhiman does not accepts Black money and corrupt peoples money at all.
They were approached by some people with huge bucks to stop their campaign against corruption.
I donated to Bharat Swabhiman.Please for god sake don`t say that my money is black money because i earned every penny of it.

valve - Delhi

@hasan abbas There are 100 lakh crore of black money in India.
Baba Ramdev said it can be brought back by currency recall.Our GOVT is not doing it.

The money you are talking about which are being donated by bhakts are mostly controlled by State GOVT or Central GOVT.

Hindu,Muslims,Christian,Atheist all kind of people in GOVT controls the money that are being donated to GOVT.

I don`t know what our GOVT do with that money.

At last i want to say that Baba Ramdev respects all religion and we must respect him and join Bharat Swabhiman Andolan to fight corruption and bring back black money.

I hope you would support us.

Dhurva - India

All the predictions of Swamyji about quantum of black money,corruption prevalent etc have come true. What is seen is only the tip of the iceberg.The Govt is shielding the guilty with all its might, because it is afraid if the culprits are arrested, they will surely expose the people in power.Chor Chor Maousere Bhai !

Prakash Kirtankar - Hyderabad AP India

Baba is doing the right job. We are with him and ready to sacrifice our life for noble cause.Entire political system has to be revamped by people of India. No existing political leaders are needed because they are rotting and must be uted to save mother India. Our young generation is quilified enough for collective work and from them only innovative and refreshing ideas of govrnance has to come. The revolution of Egypt is sure to change the world.

Pradeep Kumar Mukherjee - Delhi

I appreciate initiative taken by Baba Ramdev against prevailing corruption and wish we all should come forward to support him for his action plan in this direction.It is a matter of national importance and all those love and want to see nation at high with pride must act against corruption.

Ramesh - Pune

people of the country are fed up of blame game done by 2major parties .social networking sites played vital roles in EGYPT.we need this kind of movement.WE WANT CHANGE.

piyooshi sharad - delhi

Three cheers for Baba Ramdeo. After a long-long time, a leader has emerged who is (truly) honest, selflessly fully dedicated to the cause of grass-root Indians and wants to see our motherland prosperous, free of corruption, healthy and superpower. More and more people will join him and support the cause being persuaded by him. Jai Hind!



What about the black money in India. This may be thousand times more than that stashed outside. Hundreds of temples, religious places are the safe heavens for thousands of corrupt politicians, bureaucrats and industrialist who bow down to these religious heads for their BLESSINGS. No Govt in India has the guts to touch these. Baba Ramdev is about to float a political outfit. How can an ordinary Yoga Guru do this, as it needs Crores of Rupees. Before talking about others he should first disclosed the source of his funds and assets. (pls don’t say BHAKTA’a offerings!!!). He speaks half truth and points out one section of Politicians as even a child knows every political party is corrupt, dependent on underworld, black (illegal) money, looting crores of public money for their personal use. Black money has the black history of decades and not years.

hasan abbas - Mangalore

The resolute with which Baba Ramdevji has taken up the issue is enough to ignite spark. In the interest of the Nation, the Government should take decisively and mere setting up of enquiry commission and GOM has proved farce. If the Government desires, they can very well bring an ordinance to attach the ill gotten property or frozen their bank account. I have a word of caution to Baba Ramdevji also. He or his Sanstha should not take financial or material support from the business houses or politicians.
Ettirankandath Krishnadas, Sree Kailasam, Kinassery, Palakkad – 678 701 Kerala

ettirankandath krishnadas - kinassery,

The interviewer as well as the interviewee are known for their biased views and political agenda. The interviewer is known for pushing Saffron agenda at the slightest pretext (or even no pretext) and the interviewee is known for his ambition to use political discontent to further his political career. Virtually all figures quoted by him are imagined by him

RAJESH KUMAR - Mumbai

I TOTALLY AGREE WITH BABA RAMDEV. NOT BECAUSE I LIKE HIM AND HIS IDEA. IN FACT I WROTE 2 WEEKS BACK THAT WITH IN ONE YEAR THERE WILL BE MASSIVE CHANGE IN INDIA. MORE OVER EGYPT WILL DEFINITLY REPEAT IN INDIA AND DUTING TRANSITION PERIOD ARMY MUST STEP IN. ALL POLITICAL LEADERS MOVEMENT OUT OF THE COUNTRY MUST BE STOPPED. ALL KNOWN CORRUPT SHOULD BE ARRESTED. ALL PRESENT HEAD OF ANY GOVT AND SEMI GOVT ORGANIZATION MUST BE REPLACED WITH IN 2 WEEKS OF REVOLUTION. EVERY TOP OFFITIAL IS CORRUPT AND I STILL WANT TO GIVE ALL CORRUPT LAST CHANCE TO COME CLEAN AND HAND OVER ALL BLACK MONEY IN A SEPARATE FUND AND COME TOGETHER FOR NATIONAL BUILDING. EVERY CRIMINAL SHOULD BE GIVEN A CHANCE TO REFORM. I AM SURE BABA RAMDEV WILL LEAD A PEACEFUL REVOLUTION TO ITS LOGICAL CONCLUSION. JAI BHARAT. THIS IS MY OPEN LETTER WHEN BABA RAMDEV WANT I SHALL RETURN TO INDIA AND PARTICIPATE IN NATION BUILDING.JAI BHARAT. THE NAME OF THE COUNTRY HAS TO BE CHANGED.

debashis bhattacharya - uae

I appreciate efforts of zee news... time will come for zee news to become a india best news channel .. true patriotic news ... thanks alot zee news for making aware of everybody on corruption and black mony

Mahesh Kumar Sharma - Singapore

100% fact with 100% passion is what Baba Ramdev is made of.

He is passionate about India and wants to change Indian political system to stop the deaths of 5000 childrens who die everyday and suicides of 2 lakh farmer every year.

There are many people opposing him,in my opinion all of them are traitors who oppose Bab Ramdev`s concept.

Join ``The Bharat Swabhiman Andolan/movement`` to save India.
You can start from joining the movement via Facebook.

valve - India

It is a national problem.Baba should be supported by all honest people irrespective of their political views.The wealth of India is draining out at a very fast rate.A time will come when India will be unable to pay for its imports.

JAY JOLLY - EDMONTON

In India religion has no place in politics but unfortunately there are hindu and muslim parties reprents their own agenda not the agenda of people.
Ram dev is one example.

baldev sood - toronto,canada

May God Bless Baba Ramdev and his efforts to remove corruption, poverty, and shameless politicians.

Jeff Ram Brijwasi - Toronto

I agree with the baba ji all activities are clear.

Vipin Kumar - Muzaffar Nagar



Exactly totally agreed..there must an Egypt like revolution in India also.

Sarthak Jivani -

Waiting for sataya yoga!

homer - uk

I am very much impressed with the Baba Ramdev`s agenda, persistent hard work and pray GOD to bless BABA RAMDEV with success.

I hope Baba Ramdev will educate and prepare large population to carry on his message and root out the corruption.

Only punishing the politicians is not enough but they must return the stolen money along with penalty and then they should be hanged in public. Without this it is impossible to clean up the system.

I also appreciate ZEE TV for supporting the campaign. I hope ZEE TV spare some more time slot for constructive programs to educate the nation and guide the citizens to patriotic path.

Panchal - Cairo, Egypt

Monday, February 7, 2011

Azadi not main concern in Kashmir, Islam is: Jamaat - Express India

Azadi not main concern in Kashmir, Islam is: Jamaat - Express India

Expressindia » Story

Azadi not main concern in Kashmir, Islam is: JamaatFont Size -A
+A

RIYAZ WANI
Posted: Feb 08, 2011 at 0757 hrs IST

Srinagar Kashmir's grand old religious-cum-political outfit Jamaat-i-Islami, which is the parent party of Hurriyat hawk Syed Ali Shah Geelani, on Monday said that the propagation of religion, and not the pursuit of politics and power, is its primary concern, and hence, the struggle for Azadi is secondary for it.

“Jamaat was primarily founded for the propagation of religion. Our first duty is to fulfil this obligation. Resolution of Kashmir is secondary for us,” Jamaat Amir Sheikh Ghulam Hassan told The Indian Express.

“However, as a party we have to respond to the evolving situation and day-to-day problems. Kashmir is one such problem and we seek its peaceful settlement,” he added.

The Jamaat’s assertion is significant, as it seems to dissociate itself from the separatist narrative, despite being at the forefront of political groundwork for the separatist movement in 1989. Now Jamaat’s leaders are seen addressing only religious gatherings.

Hassan said there was no ban on the propagation of religion. “We can continue with our primary job of spreading the message of Islam. The Constitution of India doesn’t bar it. Otherwise, how could Jamaat-i-Islami, Hind, function in this country?,” he said.

Significantly, he also distanced his party from the hardline faction of Hurriyat Conference, led by Geelani. “We are not part of any Hurriyat faction. We don’t want to be one,” Hassan said.

He said Jamaat would want a unified separatist leadership and not a situation where leaders ply their own agenda and politics. “Let all factions come under one umbrella and formulate a common approach on Kashmir. We would like to be a part of such a formation,” he added.

When asked whether Geelani continued to be a member of the Jamaat, Hassan said that he is a member only on paper. “Geelani claims to be a member of the Jamaat, but he doesn’t follow the discipline and responsibilities of a Jamaat leader,” Hassan said.

When contacted, hardline Hurriyat spokesman Ayaz Akber said they had no knowledge of the Jamaat having pulled out of their faction. “Jamaat doesn’t attend our meetings. But the party has never formally conveyed its decision. We still consider Jamaat as part of the Hurriyat,” he said.

The Jamaat had supported Geelani when he broke away from the Hurriyat in 2003 and formed his own separatist faction. However, in recent years, its relations with Geelani have often come under severe strain with the party feeling “insufficiently consulted” in the Hurriyat’s decision-making process and Geelani floating a political party of his own, Tehreek-i-Hurriyat.

The breaking point came in April last year when a book in praise of Geelani criticised Jamaat for its passive political role in the past two decades and Geelani said nothing in Jamaat’s defense. Subsequently, the outfit felt slighted when Pakistan, while inviting separatist leadership to Islamabad, ignored the Jamaat.

A manufacturing strategy for India by ARUN MAIRA

A manufacturing strategy for India by ARUN MAIRA
28 Jan, 2011, 03.40AM IST, ARUN MAIRA,

Indian manufacturing has failed to be an engine of growth, which it must urgently become. Rather than exceeding and leading the overall growth of the economy as it should, manufacturing has just about come along. Moreover, the formal manufacturing sector has added few jobs in the past decade.

And worryingly, it is losing depth. While China's GDP is 3.8 times larger than India's, its production of machine tools, the 'mother industry' of manufacturing, is 55 times more! India needs a strategy to grow manufacturing 12% to 14% per annum, create 100 million new manufacturing jobs in the next 15 years to realise its 'demographic dividend', and create more depth in capital goods industries and innovation for its manufacturing sector to be competitive and sustainable.

China's remarkable success in manufacturing is the result of a strategy to win, as was the growth of the other Asian industrial powerhouses, Japan and South Korea. Having built its manufacturing base, China is scaring the world with its strategy to build 'indigenous innovation'. India too has announced its intention to strengthen innovation. An innovation strategy must be closely intertwined with a manufacturing one.

Science results in innovations when ideas are converted into real things that people can use. Therefore, it is not surprising that China's strategy to stimulate 'indigenous innovation' includes policies about what must be manufactured in the country, what the ownership of these enterprises must be, and what ownership rights these enterprises must have on the technologies used in their products.

Indian policymakers are dancing around the same issues. The idea of an industrial strategy evokes fears of returning to a planned economy. India must be open to foreign investments and new technologies from abroad. But they must result in jobs, innovations, and manufacturing depth in India. Appropriate receptors are required within a developing economy to absorb foreign technology.

The receptors are production organisations in the host country that use the technology to produce things for the market - domestic or export. Merely an R&D lab as a counterpart to a foreign R&D lab will not result in the absorption of technology. Indeed, even domestic R&D labs require production organisations to convert their ideas into usable innovations: hence the need for strong industry-lab partnerships.

The quality of the industrial partner in the host country and its ambitions to learn, apply, and improve the technologies determines whether the technology is well absorbed or not. This has been empirically established by studies of the growth of technological capabilities within developing countries, including Indian experience in the auto and pharma industries.

The local partner must have an 'industrial' orientation, not merely a 'trading' one: a long-term ambition to create an institution with technical depth, not merely an ambition to sell things and make quick profits. Therefore it is not surprising that absorption most often happens in private sector companies, which have ambitions to prove that 'it can be done in our country, and we will some day do it even better than you'.

This is the spirit that drove the Japanese and Korean industrialisation strategies. In the absence of enough such private sector companies, governments turn to PSEs as the reliable receptacles for receiving the foreign technologies, which is the case in China. Indian strategy should wean itself away from PSEs. However, for India to succeed in strengthening 'indigenous' innovation, our policymakers must consider the question of who are good receptors.

A strategy for growing 'Indian' innovation/industrial capabilities must explain why 'Indian-ness' should matter and what is 'Indian'? These questions surface, not only in India, but even in the US, when defence, telecommunications, and security are involved. Governments are accountable to their people for security - even if they leave industrial development to market forces.

Therefore governments must ensure that the means for maintaining security can be commanded by them whenever required. So, they would require that organisations in critical, security-related areas have national security as an objective overriding their obligations to their financial stakeholders. This is the reason why governments may insist that defence and security must be in public hands; and if not , then in the hands of 'domestic' companies.

But what is a 'domestic' company? A company must be responsible to its shareholders, wherever they may be. Whereas national governments, whether elected or not, must be principally accountable to their own citizens. The mismatch between the objectives of global corporations and national governments is leading to thorny governance issues even in the US: of reconciling what accountability means to a global corporation and what it means to a national government.

China's approach is very clear. Policies will be framed to strengthen domestically-owned and managed capabilities. One of the principal fears that foreign companies have is that China will steal their intellectual property. China has a large market that tempts foreign companies to stay even when Chinese government policies turn inhospitable, as regards intellectual property.

In fact, the Chinese government is framing IPR rules to further its own interests, suspecting that the rules being imposed on it have been devised principally to protect foreign companies' interests. China is using the lever of purchases by government agencies to develop indigenous technology.

It is also using the lever of national standards drawn up to suit local enterprises and shut out foreign competition. In contrast, India's position regarding IPR must be to actively engage in the discourse with global advocates of strong IPR. However, whatever these advocates propose need not be accepted as proven truths about the value of IPR. India must discover the best approach to IPR for stimulating the ongoing innovation it needs without creating monopolies through IPR rules.

The time has come for Indian policymakers to shape a national manufacturing strategy. The sustainability of India's growth story depends on it. We must, of course, overcome weaknesses in infrastructure and administration. But we must also address tough policy questions to promote Indian enterprises. And the strategy cannot be a return to a planned economy. Nor can it be an imitation of China. This is the challenge for Indian policymakers.

(The author is member, Planning Commission)

DB Realty's promoter fails to turn up before CBI

DB Realty's promoter fails to turn up before CBI

8 Feb, 2011, 01.21AM IST,ET Bureau

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/latest-news/db-realtys-promoter-fails-to-turn-up-before-cbi/articleshow/7448410.cms

NEW DELHI: Shahid Balwa , the promoter of DB Realty who made a fortune by selling a 45% stake in Swan Telecom to the UAE-based Etisalat in 2009, continued to keep the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) waiting on Monday. Balwa, who has been called by the investigative agency for questioning on his alleged links with former telecom minister A Raja, and his party, the DMK, failed to turn up at the CBI headquarters, citing bereavement in his family.

CBI officials believe that Balwa holds the key in unlocking the money trail riddle of the kickback funds that changed hands in return for the allocation of 2G spectrum during Raja's tenure as the telecom minister. His fate will be decided by the CBI on the basis of his interrogation.

The CBI accused the former telecom minister showering largesse on a clutch of telecom companies, including Swan and Unitech, in the distribution of 2G spectrum.

Investigating agencies, probing the alleged irregularity in allocation of 2G licences, are examining a transaction in which over Rs 200 crore was transferred from the Mumbai-based DB group to Kalaignar TV, a broadcaster majority-owned by family members of DMK party chief M Karunanidhi.

The transaction, in which Rs 214 crore was transferred in fiscal 2009-10 from a subsidiary of DB Realty to Kalaignar TV by way of two other companies, entailed an entity, christened Cineyug, picking over 30% stake in the TV channel, pointed out DB Realty's CFO and executive director Asif Balwa.

The deal, however, fell through because of valuation differences and the money had since been repaid, Asif Balwa maintained.

Interests of the investigating agencies, including the CBI and the income tax, have been aroused in the deal because Swan Telecom, the telecom arm of DB Realty, was among the companies that bagged 2G licences in 2008. The ex-telecom minister, they believe, went out of his way to favour Swan Telecom, something that has been highlighted by the CAG in its report on the issue of licences and allocation of 2G by the DoT.

The CAG noted that the priority lists in Punjab and Maharashtra were tweaked deliberately to give undue advantage to Swan Telecom in the allocation of spectrum. "In the Punjab service area, only 15 MHz GSM spectrum was available in September 2008, which was sufficient to meet the demand of only first applicants in the priority list, i.e., HFCL, Idea Cellular Ltd and Unitech Wireless Pvt Ltd.

The request of Idea Cellular Ltd, which was at the second place in the priority list, was, however, not considered on the grounds of its proposed merger with Spice Communications Ltd, which was offering service in the Punjab area. By keeping out Idea Cellular Ltd from the priority list, spectrum was allocated to Swan Telecom, which was on the fourth position on the priority list,'' the CAG report said.

Fresh row over ISRO's spectrum allocation

Fresh row over ISRO's spectrum allocation

8 Feb, 2011, 01.18AM IST,ET Bureau

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics/nation/fresh-row-over-isros-spectrum-allocation/articleshow/7448351.cms

NEW DELHI: The Opposition has found another weapon to target the UPA government following reports that the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) was scrutinising a spectrum deal done by the Indian Space Research Organisation (Isro). The CAG is looking into a 2005 agreement between the Indian Space Research Organisation's commercial arm Antrix Corporation and private company Devas Multimedia .

The private firm was leased around 60 MHz of the scarce S-band spectrum for 20 years for Rs 600 crore. ISRO was given the contract to launch two satellites for Devas too as part of the deal.

However, the CAG clarified on Monday that it had not made any findings but only audit of certain activities of the Department of Space were under way.

The Opposition attack followed reports in a section of the media in the Antrix-Devas deal. In a statement, CAG said that its attention was drawn to reports appearing in media regarding audit being undertaken by Audit and Accounts Department of DoS.

"The news item gives the impression as if our audit has been finalised. This office clarifies that audit of certain activities of DoS is under way. Very preliminary queries have been raised which are yet to be replied by that department. Since the audit is at very preliminary stage, it can by no stretch of imagination, be concluded that information as given in the media reports are findings of this department," the CAG statement said

ET had reported on August 10, 2010, that the Law Ministry had told the Department of Space that it could annul the Antrix contract with Devas. The Law Ministry's views were sought after Cabinet Secretary KM Chandrasekhar wrote to DoS, asking if the deal could be scrapped, following a huge sum raised by 3G spectrum auction. The hitherto virtually unnoticed deal attracted the attention of several ministries after the auctions for third-generation and broadband wireless airwaves raised over 1.06 lakh crore.

Devas, owned by former Isro official MG Chandrasekhar, sold a stake to a group of foreign investors, including Deutsche Telekom and private equity firm Columbia Capital, after the spectrum was allotted.

The Law Ministry had described the contract as illegal and said the government should take back the spectrum citing national interest, a top government official who had seen the Law Ministry's written opinion, had told ET.

Devas had clarified then that the deal was first approved by the Antrix board, which had Isro chairman, representatives from the Department of Space as well as eminent external independent members such as Ratan Tata. It was then approved by the Space Commission, whose members included the Cabinet Secretary, Minister of State for Science and Technology, the National Security Advisor and Isro chairman. It also said that in 2005, the Union Cabinet too approved the deal. The matter has now attracted the Opposition's attention after a national daily reported CAG was scrutinising the deal. Describing it as a scandal bigger than the 2G spectrum allocation, BJP and Left parties on Monday demanded a probe into the deal,

The issue may add to the woes of the UPA government, struggling to deal with the storm kicked up by 2G spectrum scam. The Opposition is firm on its demand for a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) probe into 2G spectrum.

"It's a very serious scandal. The Department of Space comes directly under the prime minister. This whole affair is vitiated by fraud. The country is witnessing not only loss of revenue but also frittering away of its national assets," BJP spokesperson Nirmala Sitharaman told reporters here.

Besides seeking a probe, BJP demanded recovery of the spectrum and lost revenue. However, the party has not yet brought the new scam into the ambit of its demand for a JPC into corruption issues. Quoting media reports, Sitharaman said the private company has got 70 MHz of the spectrum space for just Rs 1,000 crore. The report had put the value of the loss at Rs 2 lakh crore. Ms Sitharaman also pointed out that the quantum of spectrum in the case of 2G spectrum was just 4.4 MHz. Alleging that the allocation was done very quietly in the private domain, she said Devas gets custom-made satellites and transponders.

The Left parties too termed the S-band spectrum issue as "very serious" and sought an investigation. "This is a new issue. ISRO is under the Department of Space which is under the prime minister. This is also a new scam," CPM polit bureau member Sitaram Yechury alleged.

CPI's D Raja said the revelations have added a new dimension to the 2G spectrum scam. "ISRO is directly under the control of Department of Space headed by the prime minister. It is very serious as ISRO deals with space and it has implications on our security," he said.

RSP's Abani Roy said the Left will seek inclusion of the new scam in the ambit of the JPC.

Egypt's Revolution Terrifies Iran's Hardliners by MUHAMMAD SAHIMI in Los Angeles


Egypt's Revolution Terrifies Iran's Hardliners
by MUHAMMAD SAHIMI in Los Angeles


15 Comments
07 Feb 2011 00:53

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/tehranbureau/2011/02/egypts-revolution-terrifies-irans-hardliners.html?utm_campaign=homepage&utm_medium=feeds&utm_source=feeds


Regime insists 1979 Revolution inspired 2011 uprisings, fears very different parallels.

[ analysis ] Egypt's revolution has been reverberating throughout the Middle East and North Africa, terrifying every dictator and authoritarian ruler, from those of Jordan, Yemen, and Saudi Arabia to Algeria and beyond. Jordan's King Abdullah II hurriedly sacked his prime minister and appointed a new one, ordered an increase subsidies for basic commodities to benefit the poor, increased the salaries of government workers, announced his support for democratic reforms, and invited the Islamic Action Front, the political arm of Jordan's branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, to take part in a new cabinet. The Front, which enjoys the support of about 30 percent of Jordanians, turned down the invitation, saying that Marouf al-Bakhit, the new prime minister and a former army general, is incapable of implementing true reforms.

Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh, who has been in power for 32 years, promised his country's parliament that he would not seek reelection in 2013 when his current term expires nor try to hand power over to his son. This is the same man who up until a month ago was trying to amend Yemen's constitution to make himself president for life. It remains to be seen whether he will live up to his promise not to run again, as he has made similar pledges before, most recently in 2005, only to change his mind.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has promised to implement reforms by the end of the year. He has said that his nation is in a better position than Egypt and Tunisia because it has no ties with Israel, and his regime is not supported by the United States. February 4 was supposed to be the "day of rage" in Syria, with demonstrations against the government, but they did not materialize, presumably due to the heavy presence of security forces, as well as rain.

There have been demonstrations in Algeria, where a military coup in January 1992 that was supported by the United States and France prevented the Islamic Salvation Front from coming to power after it won elections the previous month. The result was a civil war in which at least 200,000 people were killed. At least three people have died of self-immolation during the past month. The government has stepped up purchases of wheat and other foods, fearing that what happened in Tunisia will happen in Algeria too. A national "day of rage" has been set for February 12. The government has already retreated by ending a state of emergency under which the country had been ruled for almost 20 years.

Saudi Arabia's ruler, King Abdullah, seems to be terrified by what is happening in the Middle East. On January 29, he called Hosni Mubarak to express his strong support. He accused foreigners of infiltrating the protests in Egypt to threaten its stability and security in the name of freedom of expression. Religious dictators who somehow see themselves as God's representatives on earth seem either not to get the people's message, or to get it only when it is too late.

The national "day of rage" for Bahrain has been set for February 14. Bahrain, where the the U.S. 5th Fleet is headquartered, is ruled by the Al Khalifa family, a Sunni tribe in a country in which two-thirds of the people are Shiites.

The Libyan people are supposed to have their national "day of rage" on February 12. Since Libya gave up its nuclear program in 2003, we have not heard much about the lack of democracy and violations of human rights there. In fact, Libya was rewarded by a 2004 state visit by then British Prime Minister Tony Blair who offered training to the country's military. Libya reciprocated the favor by awarding oil contracts to British Petroleum. Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi called Blair's successor, Gordon Brown, "my friend."

However, the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt have reverberated more deeply in Iran than anywhere else At first, the hardliners were cautious and did not know how to react. After all, these are the same nations that the hardliners and conservatives have tried to befriend for years. Majles Speaker Ali Larijani met with Mubarak in Cairo in December 2009. Over the past several months, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's representative, Hamid Baghaei, has conveyed a personal message from the president to Yemen's Saleh and traveled to Egypt. Ahmadinejad has dispatched his chief of staff and in-law Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei to Jordan with a message for King Abdullah, and he has often expressed his hope of reestablishing diplomatic relations with Egypt. Ahmadinejad was supposed to visit Tunisia himself in 2005, but after he spoke against Israel, his trip was cancelled.

At the same time, the absence of significant participation by any Islamic group in Tunisia's revolution and in the first week of Egypt's worried the hardliners. Their great "hope" for Tunisia was Rachid Ghanouchi who leads the Ennahdha (Renaissance) Party and lived in exile in London for years. On January 30, after President Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali was ousted, he flew back to Tunisia from London, where he lived in exile for years. Upon arrival, however, he declared, "Some Western media portray me like [Ayatollah Ruhollah] Khomeini, but that's not me." He also said, "Why do people want to compare me to [Osama] bin Laden or Khomeini, when I am closer to Erdogan?" The reference was to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a devout Muslim who has preserved Turkey's secular democracy. That dashed the hopes of Tehran's hardliners and conservatives of identifying a new Khomeini in an Arab nation that had experienced a popular revolt.

Several hardliners expressed their dismay at the lack of visible presence of Muslim Brotherhood leaders and supporters in the first week of the revolution in Egypt. Parviz Sarvari, a hardline Majles deputy and member of the legislature's National Security and Foreign Policy Committee (NFSPC), said, "The fundamental problem in Egypt and Tunisia is lack of leadership. The Muslim Brotherhood is still cautious, which is not acceptable, and the United States's efforts on behalf of [Mohamed] ElBaradei has created some concerns." Mohammad Saeedi, the Imam of Friday Prayers in Qom, declared, "The protestors in Tunisia and Egypt do not have a leader. The people of these two nations should know that Ayatollah Khamenei is leader of the world's Muslims, and they should obey him." Ahmad Khatami, hardline Imam of Friday Prayers in Tehran claimed that the revolution in Tunisia represents the "aftershock" of the 1979 Revolution in Iran, but did not identify the new movement's leader. In another speech, Khatami expressed his hope that Islamic leaders will soon emerge in Tunisia and Egypt and "alleviate our concerns."

But it was when many Iranians began likening the revolutions in Egypt and Tunisia to what happened in Iran in the aftermath of the 2009 presidential election that the hardliners started getting really worried. Then Mir Hossein Mousavi issued a statement praising the people of Tunisia and Egypt, and declaring their revolutions a continuation of Iran's Green Movement. The hardliners began attacking him fiercely, calling him and Mehdi Karroubi the "Green Pharaohs." The website Raja News, controlled by Fatemeh Rajabi, a hardline Ahmadinejad supporter, referred to Mousavi's statement as a "hallucination" and asserted, "Those who protested Iran's presidential election were Westernized and their leaders have close and friendly relations with Western countries.... What has provoked the rage and uprising of Arab people is that their leaders are Westernized." Alef, a website controlled by Ahmad Tavakoli, a Majles deputy and maternal cousin of the Larijani brothers, published a piece addressed to Mousavi that declared,"You have been out of the political equation for quite some time. Writing this statement is not surprising. You did this because Mahmoud Abbas [president of the Palestinian Authority] gave you some money, which is the blood money for the innocent children of Gaza; the same Abbas who collaborates with [Benjamin] Netanyahu and [Israeli Defense Minister Ehud] Barak. The same Abbas that has a photo with Mubarak." Jahan News, which is said to represent the intelligence unit of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps -- the website is run by Ali Reza Zakani, a former Guard commander -- called Mousavi "the big lie of 2009," and prophesied, "Undoubtedly the freedom- and justice-loving people of Egypt will do to the Arab dictator [Mubarak] what the people of Iran did with the Green Pharaohs."

In a seemingly orchestrated manner, the hardliners and conservatives also began likening the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt to the Islamic Revolution of 1979. Abbas Kosari, a former Guard commander and deputy head of the Majles NSFPC claimed, "The reason for what is happening in Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, and Yemen is that their leaders have not paid attention to their people. People [in these countries] are religious and it is with such thinking that they have taken their positions." Hossein Alaei, former commander of the Revolutionary Guards' joint staff, warned the people of Tunisia about a "new dictator" and said of Ben Ali's 23-year reign, "There was no free election in Tunisia to enable people to elect another person," as if Iran does have such elections. Kazem Jalali, the spokesman for the Majles NSFPC declared, "The West is trying to control what is going on by replacing some officials with others, whereas the people of Tunisia and Egypt want fundamental changes," as if Iranians do not want the same fundamental changes. Mohammad Taghi Mesbah Yazdi, the reactionary ayatollah and spiritual leader of the hardliners, claimed that the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt are the consequence of and modeled on Iran's Islamic Revolution of Iran. Ali Larijani asserted that the Arab revolutions are driven by people returning to their Islamic identities. Brigadier General Abdolrahim Safavi, deputy chief of staff of Iran's regular armed forces claimed, "There is a pro-Islam wave in north Africa, particularly in Egypt."

More pragmatic conservative analysts, such as Mohammad Sadegh Koushki, questioned the link between the Islamic Revolution of 1979 and the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt. Koushki bluntly said, "What have we done for such countries that we expect their revolution to be Islamic? What is going on in Tunisia and Egypt is the result of people being tired of dictatorship, poverty, and corruption."

Then, in his sermon during Friday Prayers in Tehran on February 4, Ayatollah Khamenei claimed that the revolution in Egypt is the continuation of the 1979 Revolution in Iran and called on the Egyptian clergy to play a role in it. He argued that the primary motivation for the recent revolutions was that the people of Tunisia and Egypt were humiliated by having leaders who acted as lackeys of the United States and Israel.

The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood swiftly responded to Khamenei's assertion, declaring, "Egypt's revolution is a people's revolution with no Islamic agenda." Khaled Hamza, editor-in-chief of the Brotherhood's official English website said, "The Egyptian protests are not an 'Islamic' uprising, but a mass protest against an unjust, autocratic regime that includes Egyptians from all walks of life and all religions and sects." He directly denounced Khamenei's claims that the protests are a sign of an "Islamic Awakening" inspired by the 1979 Revolution.

This is not the first time that the Arabs have swiftly responded to Khamenei and his fantasies of leading the Islamic world. After the ayatollah criticized the negotiations between the Palestinian Authority and Israel in his sermon during the public prayers celebrating the end of Ramadan, Fatah, the Palestinian movement, quickly issued a statement condemning him and calling his comments "shameless." Just two weeks later, after Ahmadinejad criticized the direction of the negotiations between the two sides, Nabil Abu Rodeina, spokesman for the Palestinian Authority, said, "A person who is not representative of the Iranian people, has committed electoral fraud, has repressed the Iranian people and stolen power, cannot speak about Palestine."

Neither Khamenei nor any other official cared to explain why the 1979 Revolution has reached these countries only now and not much sooner. None of them dared to talk about the many similarities between what happened in Iran in the aftermath of the 2009 election and what is happening now in Egypt. None mentioned the fact that a most important goal of the 1979 Revolution was freedom. Otherwise, the only similarity between the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt and the Iranian Revolution of 1979 is that all three countries were ruled by secular, pro-Western dictatorships. None has said why they condemn the attacks of Mubarak's supporters on the peaceful demonstrators, but unleashed the Revolutionary Guard and Basij militia on the peaceful demonstrators in Tehran and elsewhere after the 2009 election. They invoke the pharaohs to describe Mousavi, Karroubi, and Mohammad Khatami, but do not bother to explain to people the criteria for being a pharaoh, because they recognize that the criteria would fit themselves, not the leaders of the Green Movement.

As Mousavi's online newspaper Ghalam-e Sabz put it, "The people of the region are against dictatorship, whether it is in the name of religion or secularism."

Why do the hardliners insist that the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt are influenced by the 1979 Revolution in Iran? The reasons are multifold. First is that after claiming for three decades that they are a model for the rest of the Islamic world to follow, it is impossible for the hardliners to acknowledge that a revolution taking place in one of the most important Islamic nations is not modeled after Iran's. The second reason is that the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt have been distinctly nonideological, led in a secular manner, even though the leaders are probably practicing Muslims. The third reason is that the two revolutions have been largely peaceful, aided by the military, which in each case has refused to shoot at peaceful, unarmed demonstrators. One has already succeeded, and the second is on the verge of success. The hardliners are keenly aware of dissatisfaction in the rank and file of Iran's armed forces. The fourth reason is that the hardliners know that both regimes were supported by the West and in particular the United States, yet the people have succeeded with virtually no practical help from foreign powers. This debunks and deflates the hardliners' claim that only the foreign powers want to change the Iranian regime and that, except for a small segment of the population that is pro-Western, the people are satisfied with the present political system.

But perhaps the most important reason is that the hardliners are worried that the success of the revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt will energize and bring the Green Movement out onto the streets once again. They are well aware of the fact that the movement is alive and well, bidding its time and waiting for the right opportunity to resurface. Furthermore, these developments are happening at a time when the anniversary of the Iranian Revolution approaches, reminding the people of the unfulfilled promises of their own revolution.

In a letter to Interior Minister Mostafa Mohammad Najar, Mousavi and Karroubi have asked him to issue a permit for demonstrations in support of the revolution in Egypt on Monday, February 14. That has put the hardliners in a very difficult position. If they do not grant the permit, their stream of propaganda promoting their supposed support of the Egyptian people will be exposed as hollow and meaningless. But if they do issue the permit, the Green Movement will have an opportunity to demonstrate its strength.

Similar to Tehran's hardliners, Barack Obama also seems not to grasp what is going on in Egypt. His administration favors a transition from Mubarak to Vice President Omar Suleiman, a staunch Mubarak supporter who since 1993 has been at the helm of Egypt's security apparatus, one of the most notorious such forces in the Middle East. In other words, Obama wants Mubarakism without Mubarak. That is no longer sufficient for the Egyptian people. In their entire 7,000 years of history, this is the first time that they have a real chance of electing their leader freely. They will not miss the chance this time, no matter what the U.S. and Israeli establishments want.

Copyright © 2011 Tehran Bureau
SHARE

Community Disqus

Showing 15 comments
Sort by Subscribe by email Subscribe by RSS
Antonio 21 hours ago

Great article Dr. Sahimi.
Now sound that the stakes in Iran are very high. Maybe a new opportunity for all the persons who want a change, a real change, o surface and give an hope for a great nation.

4 people liked this. Like
Reply
Najafashraf14 1 hour ago in reply to Antonio

I sense fear in this paranoia.

Like
Reply
Pirouz 17 hours ago

"Terrified"? You're concocting narratives again, Muhammad. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The Iranians are see big opportunities open up should these Arab countries achieve true sovereign independence, particularly with regards to their regional foreign policies.

Yes, the Arabs in these countries haven't yet resorted to religion in the manner Iran did in '79/'79. But then again, they haven't yet succeeded in decapitating their dictatorships and reasserting their own sovereign independence either. It really is up in the air whether they'll be able to achieve what Iran did back in '79, where religion was instrumental in their success.

The Arabs might not like comparing their attempts at revolution to Iran's in '79 for a variety of reasons, one being an aversion to things Persianate and another being terrified of potentially having to go at the world alone like Iran today and Britain in 1940. But let's see how far they actually get with their attempted revolution or, in the Egyptian case, the MB's talks with the VP over reform. That is to say, let's see how far they get not using the Iranian example.

2 people liked this. Like
Reply
Agha Irani 7 hours ago in reply to Pirouz

In that case lets see if the terrorist regime that you support "Pirouz" allows demonstrations on 14th Feb.

I suspect the author of this article is correct and the terrorist regime is terrified that millions will come on to the streets to demonstrate their opposition to the barbaric islamist tyranny and will therefore ban the demo.

You on the other hand as usual are spewing out the propaganda of your masters in the intelligence ministry and other apparatus of the islamo-nazi terrorist regime who continue to oppress the Iranian people.

7 people liked this. Like
Reply
Guest 14 hours ago in reply to Pirouz

'The Iranians are see big opportunities open up should these Arab countries achieve true sovereign independence, particularly with regards to their regional foreign policies.'
---I agree.
yet I think they may be unaware or underestimating how this flame may catch their sleeve too.


'Yes, the Arabs in these countries haven't yet resorted to religion in the manner Iran did in '79/'79. But then again, they haven't yet succeeded in decapitating their dictatorships and reasserting their own sovereign independence either.'
---agreed.


' potentially having to go at the world alone like Iran today and Britain in 1940.'
---actually Nazi Germany in 1940 went alone. They got anihilated. ideological Nazis (like Islamic republic) with the help of their brownshirts (like bassijis)





3 people liked this. Like
Reply
Ahvaz 13 hours ago in reply to Guest

oops. My name didnt get published for some reason. The guest of course was me, your buddy Ahvaz.

pirouz,
I guess that is the difference between the u and me... You compare Islamic republic to England in WWII. To me they are more like Nazis.

it may have some thing to do with the fact that unlike you, I have actually lived in Iran, under the Sharia law. And I am not OK with it.
Mainly because I view Islamic republic and its laws, as barbaric, inhumane, sadistic, backwards, unjust, indicent, and unholly ( never mind the incompetence and plunder by the regime ----that happens every where).


4 people liked this. Like
Reply
Ahvaz 12 hours ago in reply to Ahvaz

'Mainly because I view Islamic republic and its laws, as barbaric, inhumane, sadistic, backwards, unjust, indicent, and unholly'

....and UnIranian....I left out UnIranian... did I miss any thing else?
.

2 people liked this. Like
Reply
Pirouz 11 hours ago in reply to Guest

Guest, in 1940 Germany was the successful hegemonist power of Europe. Their allies included Italy, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, in addition to puppets such as Quisling, Petain and many others. Plus they had the non-aggression pact with the USSR. In June 1940, Britain's relationship with the US was little more than Iran's relationship with Russia or China in 2005.

Going back to the topic of this thread, it is rather early to tell how things will wind up in Egypt (or Tunisia). But at this stage for the MB to signal they are pressing for nationalism is a sign of potential weakness. Then again, they have no charismatic leader, as did the Iranians in '78.

Upon further reflection, I also think it's dishonest to portray Iranian politics in the manner Muhammad does in his articles here at TB. He seeks to portray EVERYTHING in Iranian politics relative to a nebulous movement that only exists in the hype of Western media. Muhammad, a more honest and constructive focus would be to offer us more liberal voters in Iranian elections the names and views of more liberal MPs and potentials presidential candidates, that is to say leaders that are actually relevant to Iranian politics. Reformist MPs such as Dr. Kavakebian, Dr. Khabbaz, and Dr. Pazeshkian, as well as other reformists such as Professor Aref. I'm sure you can come up with more. Come on, Muhammad, lets get real, shall we?

Like
Reply
Pirouz 9 hours ago in reply to Pirouz

Well, I take back what I said about "the Arabs" and offer my apology.

Egypt's MB hails Leader's [Khamenei] support
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/1...

Like
Reply
Majd 6 hours ago in reply to Pirouz

This serves to show how desparate you are when you use I.R.'s Press TV as the source of your information.
Islamic Republic = LIES

3 people liked this. Like
Reply
Observer 20 hours ago

Thank you, Dr. Sahimi, for this commentary, which to me personally is hopeful. Am committed to hope, regardless, but this explanation is a lift. Again, thank you.

2 people liked this. Like
Reply
Antonio 6 hours ago

At this point, Egypt revolution is still in a crossroad, and can be manipulated. Ahvaz is right and the polls he presented for sure must make us to reflect. Till the moment, appears that the protests are interfaith, as the copte christian community is participating actively siding with muslim, agnostics, atheists. But we will have to waite to see what will be the final resuly.
Concerning Dr. Sahimi article, I consider that is very well presented. He is giving us the facts, the insight. We just have to think about, make our comments, giving our ideas.
Marx told once about a political happening occurred in France - history repeats itself twice. The first as a tragedy, the second as a comedy.

1 person liked this. Like
Reply
Ahvaz 15 hours ago

Kharmanai strives to be 'the Pope of the islamic world', which really only points to his delusional megalomania, typical of most dictators. Absolute power, and the usual surounding by YES men 'chaploos, pacheh-kharan' has realy gotten to his head. He dreams to be the Imam of Moslems! HUH It will never happen.

Yet,
Dr. Sahimi

I think there is still great danger that Egypt may go the way of Iran 79, not directly as a result of, but in a parallel fashion. Remember that Khomeini came into Iran promissing that he would stay out of politics. 'i am just an Akhoond, i will go to Qum' among many other empty promisses. But he was after absolute power the whole time.
What if the Muslim brotherhood is pulling the same trick?
they joined the movement late. They say they want democracy, yet their spokesman has said that if majority of Egyptians want the sharia law, they wouldnt object to it. very sneaky; and very familiar.

I know of limitation of polls, and I dont know how statistically valid the following polls are, but they are very freightening:
( I posted these on your previous article as well)

2007 Gallup poll in Iran, Turkey and Egypt

"SHARIA LAW MUST BE THE ONLY SOURCE OF LEGISLATION"
Turkey 7%
Iran 14%
Egypt 64%

for other questions:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/108...

...............

This is from Globe and mail (toronto, canada):

poll done in 2010, face to face , 1000 people q'ed

Egypt:
54%: Believe men and women should be segregated in the workplace

82%: Believe adulterers should be stoned

84%: Believe apostates from Islam should face the death penalty

77%: Believe thieves should be flogged or have their hands cut off

http://www.theglobeandmail.com.../



1 person liked this. Like
Reply
pirooz 18 hours ago

The only reason I would liken what is occurring to 1989, is because when Poland went democratic it was inconceivable that the other countries including Russia

would remain in a closed system with a closed ideology, it wasn't just the splintering of the Warsaw Pact. Belarus and Ukraine were an exception to this trend. There is subtle pressure from Europe and (more overt

pressure) from Russia to influence the two.

As far as trends go in the mid-east, the indigenous, authoritarian regimes present a similiar sort of bloc, an anti-democratic bloc. If one goes, its unlikely the momentum will be halted. They can easily live,

as Turkey and Erdogan seem to, with a dictatorship in Iran or their other favourite ,Syria but the region as whole cannot. The people in Tahrir Sq. (and the GM protesters of 2009) are very much what the strikers in

Gdansk were. The fate of whole nations could hinge on these events. They won't fizzle out ,the underlying conditions(mostly economic) are too grave and life-threatening. They won't morph into an opposite movement -

for greater oppression.

1979 was in my opinion, more along the lines of the Ethiopian, Yemeni , Cambodian communist revolutions. Artificial constucts that brought these countries to the verge of collapse before expiring. Before you get

too excited, yes people were in favor overwhelmingly of the revolution but take a look at Iran is it not in a state of moral collapse where up is down, good is evil? Marx (him again)," it is a rule of historical

retribution that its instrument be forged not by the offended but by the offender himself "

1 person liked this. Like
Reply
bahman_azad 14 hours ago

It's the first time I can think of that I've been disappointed by an article by Dr. Sahimi. I found this article to be a regurgitation of bullet points that have already been well covered by numerous other sources...nothing new or value-added.

The colors of intolerance

The colors of intolerance

Taseer’s murder deepens fears of Pakistani Christians

Taseer’s murder deepens fears of Pakistani Christians

Taseer’s murder deepens fears of Pakistani Christians
Reuters
January 10, 2011 (4 weeks ago)


Taseer's death — and the lionising of his killer — have struck more fear than ever in the mostly Catholic and Protestant Christian community accounting for about two per cent of the population of 170 million. — Photo by AP



ITTANWALI: To understand why Pakistani Christians feel so threatened by growing religious extremism in their country, speak to the uniformed police guard at the jail where a Christian woman is on death row, accused of blasphemy.

Aasia Bibi was sentenced to hang in November for insulting the Prophet Mohammad, under Pakistan’s controversial blasphemy laws. Last week, an outspoken liberal politician was killed by his own bodyguard for campaigning for her release.

The assassin has since been hailed as a hero by many in this Muslim majority country where a harsh, often unforgiving, brand of Islam is growing in strength.

Prison guard Ansaar Jameel, at the Sheikhpura prison where Bibi is held, summed up widespread sentiment after the killing of Punjab province governor Salman Taseer: “What happened was justified.”

Taseer’s death — and the lionising of his killer — have struck more fear than ever in the mostly Catholic and Protestant Christian community accounting for about two per cent of the population of 170 million.

The self-confessed assassin, Mumtaz Qadri, has been showered with rose petals after court appearances. Hundreds of lawyers have offered to defend him for free.

These are troubling signals that religious extremism has permeated much of Pakistan.

“If a bodyguard can kill a governor, a high profile person, a famous person here in Pakistan, the governor of Punjab Salman Taseer, what can happen to me?,” asked Christian activist Shahzad Kamran, who provides moral, legal and financial support for people convicted of violating the blasphemy laws.

Kamran has stopped visiting Bibi in jail for fear of his life. “Anybody, anybody can kill me with the same allegation as Salman Taseer was confronting,” he said.

Villagers issue their own verdict

Pakistan’s modern Christians are the children of Hindus or Muslims converted by missionaries who came to the Indian subcontinent some 250 years ago.

Christians and Muslims generally live in harmony, but many say they are treat as second-class citizens and feel insecure for several reasons, including the blasphemy laws and sporadic militant attacks on churches.

Under the laws, anyone convicted of speaking ill of Islam or the Prophet Mohammad faces life imprisonment or the death penalty. Bodyguard Qadri and his supporters accused Taseer of being a blasphemer, simply because he spoke against the laws.

While Muslims are charged with blasphemy in more than 50 per cent of cases, human rights activists say the legislation is often used to persecute minorities, or settle personal scores — as Aasia Bibi claims happened to her.

Fury at Bibi in her village, Ittanwali, seems based on hearsay that she confessed to insulting Islam. The only thing that’s clear is her troubles began with a dispute with fellow women farmhands who later accused her of blasphemy.

“If she returned I would beat her to death with anything I could get my hands on,” said Inayatullah, a 65-year-old man with fiery green eyes and a white beard. A group of people gathered around him, including a 14-year-old boy, agreed she should die.

Bibi and her family are the only Christians in the Ittanwali, a village of mud huts surrounded by sugarcane fields and orange orchards. Families burn cow dung for fuel and the place is mired in poverty and is a microcosm of the social and economic neglect that make Pakistan unstable.

Poor services discredit the government, which is deeply unpopular, and make people more susceptible to the preaching of the hardline clerics. Countrywide illiteracy rates of over 50 per cent mean these extremists wield huge power over the people.

Sitting inside the mudbrick walls of the family’s housing compound where goats graze, Bibi’s sister-in-law Farhad says clerics began announcing that “Christians are dogs” after Bibi’s arrest. So far, their Muslim neighbours have not created any problems, but that could change given the charged atmosphere after Taseer’s death.

Either way, she says the family is trapped.

“Where can we run away to? Where can we flee? We have left it all to his (God’s) mercy. He will do whatever is best for us,” said Farhad.

With the assassination of the governor, Christians know they have lost a rare defender.

Inside Lahore’s grand Sacred Heart cathedral, the archbishop of the eastern city, Lawrence Saldanha, asked worshipers at Sunday mass to pray for Taseer’s soul and asked God to give Christians the strength to practice their faith.

He told Reuters that Pakistan’s political leadership pandered to influential religious parties for support in the deeply conservative country, a common accusation.

“They try to get into politics by using religion in the wrong way, (a) very narrow interpretation of Islam,” he told Reuters.

That policy is unlikely to change anytime soon.

The deeply unpopular government needs all the support it can get. Frustrations are growing over rising inflation, power cuts and suicide bombings staged by Taliban militants.

Pakistan’s Christians can only hope Taseer’s killing will not encourage more violence against them.

In 2009, 40 houses and a church were set ablaze by a mob of 1,000 Muslims in the town of Gojra, Punjab. At least seven Christians were burned to death. The attacks were triggered by reports of the desecration of the Quran.

Back in Ittanwali, cleric Maqsood Ahmed Masoomi suggested that if anyone in the village commits blasphemy, they may not make it to the courtroom.

“They should be killed on the spot,” he said.

The forgotten prayers of a people

The forgotten prayers of a people

A Hindu woman arranges earthern lamps near to Hindu Goddesses to celebrate ‘Diwali’ the festival of lights, at her home in Lahore, Pakistan on Saturday, Oct. 17, 2009. Hindus living in Pakistan are celebrating Diwali where people decorate their homes with light. – AP Photo




KARACHI: The legend is almost as old as the Indus River, Lord Shiva and his consort Sati, daughter of King Dakhsha, were vexed by Sati’s father for not inviting them for a ceremony. Sati went to the ceremony uninvited and in return was ignored. She was hurt by the behavior that she sacrificed herself in the fires and was burnt alive. Upon hearing the fate of his love, Lord Shiva went mad and began chaos on earth.

In order to help Lord Shiva deal with his grief, Lord Vishnu cut Sati’s body in 12 pieces and scattered them across the earth where her head fell upon Hingol. Wherever the pieces of Sati’s body fell became Shakti Peethas, holy places of cosmic power, for all gods and worshippers.

Hingol is not a legend – as a matter of fact – today it is known as Hingol National Park and lies almost 170 km outside of Karachi in Balochistan. Sati’s head fell by Hinglaj Matajee Temple located inside a natural cave of a hill which is a holy pilgrimage site for the 2.5 million Hindus in Pakistan, although many feel the numbers have doubled in the last decade, and more than 90 per cent of them live in the Sindh province.

Hindus are the third religious group, after Muslim and Christians, and Hinduism is considered the indigenous religion of the sub-continent by local and international historians, which is not far from the truth.

There are over 40 Hindu temples across Pakistan, and in Sindh alone there are almost 30 temples in Karachi and interior Sindh.

Many Hindu families are indigenous to the land and some claim to have been for centuries. Over the centuries, empire after empire, some families facing persecution converted to Islam but others have remained Hindus.

“The Hindu community is not protected here,” said Dr. Raj Motwani, a general physician who sits as the Vice President for Shree Ratneshwar Mahadev Welfare Shewa Mandly, a committee for the Hindu community in Karachi. “I remember that Lee Market, Bolton Market, Nagam Colony, and Food Street belonged to Hindu families that lived there for decades before Pakistan’s existence.”

“We never left this land – people migrated here,” he said. “We are still here – fighting for what we deserve as humans.”

During the 1947 partition, almost 15 million Hindus, Sikhs, and Muslims left Pakistan for India and vice versa but some families stayed behind because they considered the land in Pakistan their home. More than half a million people died during the migration.

“Everyone knows the truth, but we cannot speak it out loud,” he said. “The minute that we speak up – we are automatically accused of being part of an enemy intelligence agency and we can get questioned without any legal support.”

Most Hindus families come from lower class backgrounds and those that live in rural areas like interior Sindh are forced into bonded labour by influential landlords. In the past few years, kidnappings have increased among the Hindus, for ransom and women, who are kidnapped and then convert to Islam, have been reported but with no real legal repercussions from the local government.

“The Hindu community is not protected here,” repeated Dr. Motwani. “The converting is explainable; once a girl is kidnapped the men have their way with her and she knows that she won’t be accepted back into her community so she converts and becomes a servant- girl for the men or the family that kidnapped her – tragic but the culture in interior Sindh is traditional, especially when it comes to women.”

The constitution clearly states that religious minorities have many rights and freedom however in the political system Hindus, Christians and Sikhs are still treated as second-class citizens.

After General Pervez Musharraf took power, he wanted to remove the separate electorate system put in place by the former dictator General Ziaul-Haq.

The separate electorate system limited non-Muslims to only vote for candidates from their own religion – the government had a reserved number of seats for minorities in the provincial and national assemblies.

General Musharraf and many others felt that it limited Muslim candidates from reaching out to minority groups to solve the major problem in their communities. He was thwarted in his efforts and many minorities felt that the removal of the policy would not have made a difference in their communities.

“I have friends of all faiths in Pakistan – friendships made up of decades,” mentioned Dr. Motwani. “But that is not the problem – the system is the problem; a small example, the Hindu Gymkhana has finally been given back to us after so many years spent in court yet the management is Muslim and we still do not have a safe place to congregate and celebrate our holidays. Who do I go to for help? a MPA or an MNA – not possible.”

Since the recent attack on the Shah Ghazi Shrine, the security at mandirs across Karachi has tightened but it has not stopped Hindu worshippers from making their offerings to their gods and goddesses who wait patiently for their prayers of better days ahead.

Banned Brotherhood joins crisis talks

Banned Brotherhood joins crisis talks

Banned Brotherhood joins crisis talks
From the Newspaper
By Cyril Almeida in Cairo
(17 hours ago) Today


Egyptian anti-Mubarak protesters chant as they wave Egyptian flags during their protest in Cairo, Egypt, Sunday, February 6. - Photo by AP



CAIRO: LEADERS of the banned Muslim Brotherhood met Egyptian Vice President Omar Suleiman for landmark discussions on a second day of talks between the government and opposition figures.

According to state television and a statement issued by Mr Suleiman`s office, the “participants in the national dialogue agreed on a number of political arrangements and constitutional and legislative measures”.

These included the creation of a committee of judicial and political figures “to study and recommend constitutional amendments … by the first week of March”; lifting state-imposed restrictions on the use of the Internet; and ending the government`s harassment of media personnel.

However, opposition figures involved in the talks responded warily to the government`s offer, which did not include a pledge to bring an immediate end to the 30-year-old rule of President Hosni Mubarak.

The offer also appeared to leave the protesters camped out in Tahrir Square unimpressed. On a day where the military further limited access to the square, thousands more lined up and patiently waited their turn to be allowed through the narrow entry point beside a row of tanks and barbed wire. By nightfall, Tahrir Square was once again full of protesters.

Elsewhere, however, Cairo limped back to some semblance of normality.

Sunday, start of the workweek in Egypt, began cautiously, with early morning traffic thin. But as banks and a few other shops opened, the activity in downtown Cairo began to pick up.

Small queues formed outside banks, delivery vans and garbage trucks appeared on the roads, and the staff at restaurants and stores shuttered for days began to prepare for business.

In the historic Khan al-Khalili bazaar, a tourist magnet, a majority of the shops were still closed at noon and shopkeepers outnumbered tourists. But within a couple of hours, business picked up as small groups of tourists appeared.

By evening, the notorious Cairo traffic was at full cry. Traffic on the October 6 Bridge slowed to a crawl, weaving its way through the tanks, armoured personnel carriers and soldiers stationed near the area overlooking Tahrir Square. But the ordinariness of a partial return to normal life in Cairo could not overshadow the extraordinariness of Vice President Suleiman`s meeting with leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood.

As noted by a diplomat, Mr Suleiman, for two decades President Mubarak`s intelligence chief, would have directly been responsible for dealing with the banned Muslim Brotherhood until his appointment as vice president last week.

“It`s mind-blowing,” the diplomat said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of official restrictions.

However, the Muslim Brotherhood`s U-turn — it had earlier declined to participate in the government-opposition talks which began on Saturday — does not signal that an end to the crisis in Egypt may be at hand.

The central demand of the `Jan 25 youth movement`, the name given to the youthful protests in Tahrir Square, remains for Mr Mubarak to step down immediately.But the statement issued by Vice President Suleiman`s office yesterday called first and foremost for “implementing the commitments announced by the president in speech to the nation on 1 February, 2011” — a speech in which Mr Mubarak appeared to rule out resigning.

So almost immediately, on foreign media and through translators to reporters in Tahrir Square, the protesters appeared unwilling to accept the concessions announced by the government on Sunday.

“What we are seeing is a tug of war,” claimed Tariq Youssef, a lecturer at a university in Cairo who supports the anti-Mubarak protesters. “It`s still not clear if (the protesters) can win outright.”

The Cairo-based diplomat, though, appeared to suggest otherwise: “This can`t go on forever. The protesters can hang on, but the government has to run things, the economy has to be taken care of.”

Day 13 of the protests, then, was like most of the 12 before it. New developments, unimaginable even two weeks ago, occurred, but still there is one constant: uncertainty over Egypt`s future.

Popular Posts

Search This Blog